Thursday, December 26, 2019

Democrats and Ethical Views - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1087 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2018/12/28 Category Ethics Essay Type Research paper Level High school Did you like this example? Introduction According to Robinson Dowson (2012), ethics refers to doing what is right, at the right time, and in the right place in accordance with the codes/standards of social norms. In ethics, the principles of integrity and morality are always prioritized while applying the set polices governing various institutions/organization in their day to day activities. However, one cannot be able to assess how ethical polices of a particular organization are until he/she clearly knows exactly the key role the set polices plays in that organization (Robinson Dowson, 2012). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Democrats and Ethical Views" essay for you Create order Hence in this paper, my primary focus will be assessing the ethicality of certain institutionalized polices by using religious differences as an example of ethical dilemma in Dirac, an entertainment and hospitality company. Lastly, for purposes of anonymity and because of the sensitivity as well as the confidentiality of the information, I have decided not to use the real name of the company. Parameter of various ethical decisions making approaches To start with, justice approach is typically based on the principle historically theorized by Aristotle, one of the great Greek philosophers, that all that embraces equity in the society should be equally treated as well. Similarly, those who tend to be unequal in the society to others should also be unequally treated. Second is the right approach. This one on the other hand arrives at the best decision by evaluating the respect of human dignity in the alternative options present. That is, it is primarily concerned with how people freely lead their lives, with all human rights respected, as well as respecting others. Thirdly, ethical decision making based on the approach of virtue simply involves assessing the how the decision will affect the character of an individual. The decision should be such that integrity, honesty, tolerance, generosity, courageousness, and many more other virtues are showcased in the end. Forth is the approach of common good. In this case, a decision is made based on the welfare of the people as an entire community and not as specific individuals. The common approach champions for welfares such as health, education, security and social-economic development agendas. Finally, a utilitarian approach can also be used in ethical decision making process. Here the principle primarily aims at ensuring that the greatest goodness is achieved in the greatest number of people while cutting down the harm-bearing in mind that consequences of the decision can be either of great benefit or quite detrimental to people. Utilitarian approach thus largely focuses on positive ramifications associated with the decision (Thomson et al., 2013). An example of ethical issue and solution to it Based on Wu et al. (2010), Dirac is a very versatile and contemporary hospitality/entertainment company based in Miami, Florida-United States of America. The company majorly deals with entertaining local/regional visitors as well as international tourists who usually come to enjoy the cool breeze at the beaches, amazing architectural buildings at the island, and many more other spectacular natural features of Miami environs. Concisely, Dirac offers housing, guides tourists around Miami using lavish Ferraris, security, traditional cultural entertainments and lastly preparing various food/cuisines for its clients. The company has three hundred employees distributed all over in Miami. Ninety percent of its employees are Adventists while ten percent are the Pentecost i.e., categorizing them based on their religious believes. It operates full time-both week days and weekends. Dirac makes an average profit of hundred million dollars per month. The profit made during Saturdays is almost dou ble the profit the company makes during the week days plus that made in Sunday. This is because most of the people tend to be busy at work during the weekdays as compared to weekends. The majority of the people is Pentecost; go to church in Sundays, while the minority is the Adventist who goes to church in Saturdays. The stakeholder are forcing all the employees to turn up every day and be given offs only at random specific time so as to maximize at profits. The Adventist employees on the other hand are strictly adhering to their religious rules and regulations of not going to work during Saturdays. As a way of blackmailing its employees, the company has promised to reward them with good salaries and other forms of allowances. Unfortunately, no single employee is heeding to their plea. Instead, they are insisting that they wont turn up at work in Saturdays. Dirac is now at the apex of organization ethical dilemma. That is, it has to decide on whether to fire a substantive number of its stubborn Adventist employee and employ Pentecost so as to maximize profits, or continue making losses due to high absentees during Saturdays. Firing of employees on the grounds of their religious affiliations is uncouth and unethical as it does not only infringe on their constitutional freedom/right to worshiping, but also unnecessarily profiling divisive polarization among the people. It is also unethical for the employees to boycott church services during Saturdays and work for a nice salary. Here the two parties to come to consensus for them to move forward. For instance, the stakeholders shoul d have work shifts during the weekend. This can only be achieved and effectively implemented by equally recruiting employees from both sides of the religious divide. Equal number of Pentecost and Adventist will eliminate the current ethical dilemma on whether advents should report at work in Saturday. In this case, half of the employee will come on Saturday and enable the company to still significantly make recognizable profits as usual. By doing so, Dirac will avoid divisions among the employees as to whether one is a Pentecost or an Adventist, promote equality as well as foster unity within the organization which will in turn spearhead the company to move towards prosperity(Wu et al., 2010). Conclusion Ethics, more especially ethical dilemmas, are sensitive societal issues that can not only create hatred among the people, but also make great companies and organizations to collapse instead of making progressive strides. Thus, it should be handled with a lot of keenness and vigilance in order to avert unnecessary conflicts. References Robinson, S., Dowson, P. (2012). Business ethics in practice. London: CHARTERED Institute OF PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT. Thomson, M. H., Adams, B. D. B. D., Sartori, J. A., Baranski, J. V., Defence R D Canada Toronto., Canada. (2013). Moral and ethical decision making: Literature review. Toronto, Ont: Defence Research and Development Canada. Wu, X., Qi, S., 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE 2010). (May 01, 2010). Notice of RetractionHuman Nature and Incentive Mechanism Design for Knowledge Workers. 954-957.

Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Minimum Requirement Infant / Toddler Child Development...

Toddler Teacher. Minimum requirement: Infant/Toddler Child Development Associate (CDA). Then on to complete 15 credits, 30 credits, 45 credits up to an Associate or Bachelor Degree in Early Childhood Education or a related field. Two years of experience working with young children. Excellent interpersonal skills, flexible hours, and basic computer skills required. Ability to: complete basic paperwork, respond to emergency situations, analyze and solve problems, move and play with small children. Perform multiple tasks and meet deadlines. Special requirements: Ability to work and cooperate with others, required to pass physical examination, T.B. test, MI state police ICHAT and MI Dept. of Human Services Child Abuse/Neglect screenings. An Equal Opportunity Employer AA M/F Vet/Disability Auxiliary aids and services are available upon request to individuals with disabilities. Other essential duties and responsibilities of Toddler Teachers: †¢ Maintain individual portfolios of each child and gauge their weekly progress in various skills via anecdotal observations †¢ Bring creative ideas to make learning fun and interesting for the children †¢ Conduct large and small group activities and also provide individualized activities for targeted skills development in each child †¢ Communicate effectively with the parents to discuss the progress and needs of children †¢ Maintain the classroom according to state and program approved standards of orderliness, cleanliness and hygiene †¢Show MoreRelatedElementary Education With Special Education1462 Words   |  6 Pagesminimum of 124 semester hours and must earn at least a 2.00 grade point average. The 124 hours are subdivided into approximately 27-48 semester hours in a discipline major. Students choosing the Child Development major must have a 2.0 GPA or above in all major coursework, a score of 75% or above for their development program, successfully complete 12 units (60 days) of clinically field-based experiences in a daycare, nursery, or K-3 setting. Those of who, complete the Child Development program of

Monday, December 9, 2019

Role of Technology in Education free essay sample

The Role of Technology in Quality Education Quality education is a universal goal. It is common to hear arguments that instructional technology will be the key to educational quality as we enter the new millenium (cf. Fiske and Hammond, 1997). Investment in educational technology is urged upon policy-makers as the path to educational quality (Mergendollar, 1996). In fact, enthusiasts for educational technology argue that quality has and will continue to increase rapidly, creating a new educational culture (Connick, 1997). Whatever problems exist are seen as ones which can be handled through better administrative and technological planning that is, technology believers perceive no intrinsic obstacles to total quality assurance using information technology in higher education (ex. , Roth and Sanders, 1996). Other voices question educational technology as a panacea. Cardenas (1998), for instance, has written on the problems associated with technology in the college classroom in terms of issues such as poorly functioning equipment, over-promotion of technology-based learning to students, and lack of quality in courses delivered by technology. A recent article in the Chronicle of Higher Education reported on critics of educational technology who say students choosing online courses are not getting the education they pay for, and question whether universities should be providing such instruction (Guernsey, 1998). The American Federation of Teachers and other faculty organizations have also raised serious cautions about web-based education (Mingle and Gold, 1996) and have even gone on strike over it. The unruly growth of online distance education is the basis of these concerns. One has only to look at popular books like, The Best Distance Learning Graduate Schools: Earning Your Degree without Leaving Home (Phillips and Yager, 1998). This work profiles 195 accredited institutions that offered graduate degrees via distance learning as of 1997-98. It acknowledges that diploma mills are a danger. Even accredited programs from recognized institutions of higher learning may have been thrown together as experiments or simply in quick response to administrative fiat. Caveat emptor is definitely a precept for student consumers of online education. In response to growing criticism of the recent, rapid, unregulated growth of distance education, a number of recognized higher education organizations have formulated quality standards and guidelines. A prominent example is the document Principles of Good Practice for Electronically Offered Academic Degree and Certificate Programs, from the Western Cooperative for Educational Telecommunications; http://www. wiche. edu/telecom/projects/balancing/principles. htm; see Johnstone and Krauth, 1996; Zuniga and Krauth, 1996; WCET, 1997). These principles have been endorsed by a number of higher education governing and policymaking bodies in the western United States, as well as by the regional accrediting community. The core assumption of these guidelines is that, The institutions programs holding specialized accreditation meet the same requirements when offered electronically. Since these guidelines are a widely-accepted definition of quality as applied to online education, they are quoted below: * Each program of study results in learning outcomes appropriate to the rigor and breadth of the degree or certificate awarded. An electronically offered degree or certificate program is coherent and complete. The program provides for appropriate real-time or delayed interaction between faculty and students and among students. * Qualified faculty provide appropriate oversight of the program electronically offered. * The program is consistent with the institutions role and mission. * Review and approval processes ensure the appropriateness of the technology being used to meet the programs objectives. * The program provides faculty support services specifically related to teaching via an electronic system. The program provides training for faculty who teach via the use of technology. * The program ensures that appropriate learning resources are available to students. The program provides students with clear, complete, and timely information on the curriculum, course and degree requirements, nature of faculty/student interaction, assumptions about technological competence and skills, technical equipment requirements, availability of academic support services and financial aid resources, and costs and payment policies. * Enrolled students have reasonable and adequate access to the range of tudent services appropriate to support their learning. * Accepted students have the background, knowledge, and technical skills needed to undertake the program. * Advertising, recruiting, and admissions materials clearly and accurately represent the program and the services available. Policies for faculty evaluation include appropriate consideration of teaching and scholarly activities related to electronically offered programs. * The institution demonstrates a commitment to ongoing support, both financial and technical, and to continuation of the program for a period sufficient to enable students to complete a degree/certificate. The institution evaluates the programs educational effectiveness, including assessments of student learning outcomes, student retention, and student and faculty satisfaction. Students have access to such program evaluation data. * The institution provides for assessment and documentation of student achievement in each course and at completion of the program. Similar guidelines may be found in connection with the worlds largest experiment in online distance education, the Open Learning experiment in the U. K. In reviewing this experiment, Mayes and Banks (1998) concluded that three factors combine to maintain quality and integrity of Open Learning courses: (1) common, structured course materials; (2) open assessment using a competency-based methodology; and (3) an extensive support and monitoring network. Numerous other efforts exist regarding quality assurance in distance education (Tait, 1997). An inspection of leading quality-in-online-education guidelines reveals three central themes. 1. Quality is defined in terms of appropriate and complete online education, with appropriateness and completeness to be adjudged by faculty. Faculty agreement, of course, is apt to refer to faculty with interests in promotion of online education, with tacit consent of peers in a typical academic culture which strongly encourages faculty course development autonomy and an administration more interested in getting into the online education game than in creating quality standards impediments to launching online offerings. Using the same textbook as the traditional course is often sufficient to meet this criterion.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Rifkin Animals free essay sample

Rifkin portrays his view that animals must be given a time of love when he states, â€Å"They crave affection and are easily depressed if isolated—the government is encouraging—to provide them with toys. † These words that have been deeply written from his heart reveal his pursuit in equality for animals, to the point that animals, like pigs, must be loved, therefore we must express this love in speaking to them daily and buying them toys. Rifkin speaks truth in his belief that we must care for animals, but before revealing love to animals and blossoming equality upon them, we must shower the endowed promise of equality amongst our nation. What about the people who suffer from depression and are consumed by suicidal thoughts? We must first speak with our lips to those who have been isolated, because humanity is in deep need of caring for each other. Another point that strikes his view is that he believes we should provide toys for animals, but there are masses of homeless children within our country that have never even glimpsed a toy, therefore if we can’t fix our internal humane issues, then how can we shower all these privileged gifts on animals? Before desiring to open the eyes of others to care about animals, Rifkin must first open his eyes and see that humanity is already drenched with enough chaos as it is, and our minds should be set on bringing healing to our nation than making animals our priority. We will write a custom essay sample on Rifkin Animals or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page His stand on helping animals carried strength, and we can do this by stopping abuse upon them, but going as far as giving them absolute equality contains fallacy.